WILLIAM B said (September 18, 2018):

Your churches will be used to teach the Jew's religion and in less than two hundred years, the whole nation will be working for divine world government. That government that they believe to be divine will be the British Empire. All religions will be permeated with Judaism without even being noticed by the masses, and they will all be under the invisible all-seeing eye of the Grand Architect of Freemasonry."

----General George Cornwallis 1781

Thomas B said (September 18, 2018):

I will make it brief and refer to Benjamin Freedman's speech of 1961. I quote from it: " ... And beyond that, the Talmud teaches: Don't forget - every time you take an oath, an oath and a promise - think of the Kol-Nidre prayer you said on the day of penance, and it makes you free to keep it.

The prayer continues to this day. In 1844 there were efforts to remove this prayer, but it failed because of Eastern Judaism. Prayer fits a satanic sect, but not a believing person.

Imran said (September 30, 2017):

Can't agree with BT's comments that "I pray" that Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Jews can turn their hearts to Christ. The Eternal One selects you. You cannot choose Him. If Christ chooses to let you remain a pagan then you stay as one for the rest of your life. Then you die and do not enter Heaven or the Lake of Fire:

http://theswordbearer.org/spD027a_soul.html

I prefer the peaceful religions of the world. Many of their adherents aren't good and lead mobs and persecutions towards those who Christ selects for a chance for Eternal Life. Buddhists in Myanmar and Hindus in India, for instance, have attacked Christians and persecuted us for no just cause...just because He selected us and we were drawn to Him. Still...there is no denying that not all their adherents are like that and have been changed into peaceful folk because of their teachings.

William said (September 30, 2017):

I don't know why Bible-believing Christian churches are caught up in the adoration of the Jew so much. Jews are sinners just like the rest of us and need a Saviour, yet I've been to very few churches that don't peddle the "God's chosen people" narrative. That silly preacher in San Antonio by the name of John Hagee even espouses the notion that Jews are under a separate covenant and don't need salvation.

believe God's chosen people were the ancient Israelites so that a pure lineage could be preserved for the advent of Jesus Christ on the earth. God often punished them for disobedience. The nation of Israel today is just as thoroughly apostate as any Western nation.

Ken Adachi said (October 11, 2016):

Michael Hoffman continues to occupy a unique position in enlightening humanity to the well-concealed role of Talmudic blasphemy in teaching generation upon generation of Jews that's it's "God's Will" that they should cheat, deceive, and prey upon non-Jewish people. Most of us would never have a clue about these reprehensible rituals and their parasitic belief structure if wan't for Hoffman's dedication to this arena of scholarship.

I find the comments by BT and AZ to be a strange stew of self righteous pedagogy, ignorance and hypocrisy. Why do fundamentalist Protestants always self identify as "Christians," while lumping Catholics, Muslims, Buddhists, Sikhs (which is not a religion), and Hindus into the "them" bin? Condemning the recitation of Hail Marys, or the sacrament of confession, or the bowing down 5 times a day in prayer to show respect to God, or characterizing the believers of Islamism as a "branch" of Judaism, or worst yet, lumping them together with Wiccan paganism and gnosticism, is typical of the self-assured, self righteous, "it's MY way or the highway" condemnatory nature of fundamentalist zealots ~ who are the last person to even realize they are zealots, and very much in need of 'awakening' themselves.

Sid said (October 10, 2016):

Henry, I would like to respond to "BT" on the Yom Kippur article. I agree wholeheartedly that in today's Judaism and Islam, repentance is replaced with Pharisaic micromanagement of the technicalities of daily life.While Christianity is most prominent in advocating repentance, In the Qur'an and the Old Testament, repentance is also preached. Old Testament Prophets urge the Israelites to follow righteousness and not just do sacrifices and outward demonstrations of piety. The Torah and Prophets describe Christ and his values. The Qur'an does this too. But modern Jews, Christians and Muslims follow a psuedo religion made by their religious clergy that violates the tenants of their holy texts. The Jews violate the Old Testament with the Talmud and the Muslims violate the Qur'an with their oral Hadeeth, their equivalent of the Talmud. Catechisms of the church are also human traditions that sometimes contradict revelation. That being said, Christianity does the best job of emphasizing the spirit of the law rather than the letter of the law. All religions could learn more from Christianity in this regard, yet modern Christianity has its own problems, which all go back to the Illuminati of course. Many Jews repent sincerely on Yom Kippur, and don't know much about Kol Nidre. Simple people in all 3 religions should follow the basic obvious moral guidelines rather than dividing against each other in the interest of Satan.

AR said (October 10, 2016):

Hoffman uses Babylonian Talmud: Nedarim 23a and 23b as the basis for his argument. All Nedarim is about laws about self-made pledges in the name of God. Not about promises or vows to others. The specific text he cites is about breaking nedarim only, not other kind of vows.

In Judaism, a neder[pronunciation?] (נדר, plural nedarim[pronunciation?]) is a declaration, using the name of God, of the acceptance of a self-made pledge, stating that the pledge must be fulfilled with the same importance as a halakha.[1] The neder may be to fulfill some act in the future (either once or regularly) or to refrain from a particular type of activity of the person's choice. The concept of the neder and the surrounded Jewish law is described at the beginning of the parsha of Matot.

The word neder is often translated into English and other languages as a vow, but this is inaccurate: a neder is neither a vow nor an oath (known in Hebrew as "shevuah"). The simple recitation of a vow is not considered swearing an oath. There is no single word in English to describe a neder.

Rob said (September 23, 2015):

The Article on The "Jews" is Spot On........This is a Masterful Plan carried out by Satan and was Planned many Centuries ago to Deceive The Unlearned Sheep who even today think these Imposters are The Chosen People.....Firstly the word JEW was first invented in The 16th Century when The Bible was being Translated for Printing into other languages.....The word came from "Judeans" but I think it was Invented for the very reason we see evident today...... To Hoodwink the World......

The "JEWS" of today are basically descendants of The Khazars which appeared around the 8th Century and converted to Judaism for political purposes- The Plan was in motion and today these clever imposters Own everything and control The World.......Very opposite to what you would envisage as Gods children - In fact they reject Christ as well very openly, but yet the Stupefied still believe these are The Chosen ones........In fact they are Satan's Bloodline and that's why they control all things because it is Satan's World Still.....

Rothschild stole the name "Israel" from JACOB the real Israel named by God! ......The Real Children of God are From The 12 Tribes of JACOB- These being 10 Northern Tribes- 2 Southern Tribes.......The 10 northern Tribes are best known as The Lost Ten Tribes which are basically now "Gentiles"..........

This plan was So Important that I believe WW2 was designed to bring in The False Holocaust for World sympathy and it worked- 1947 The decree went out and granted that "Israel" would become it's own state by May 1948!!!! What a Coincidence........And The Charade goes on!!!!!

JJ said (September 18, 2018):

One of the things that those who promote multi-culturalism don't realize is that cultural loyalty is hard work. A loyal and concerned mother takes care of her children first. She doesn't abandon her children to take care of other children. This is the same with culture. We must take care of our culture first. This is one thing that really irks many whites about the minorities that come here. They don't care about their own cultures.

To the Jamaican, Chris G., why didn't you mourn that your real estate agent and your broker were not Jamaican? You don't mourn because you don't care because you don't even know what the issues are. I say this to all who come here. What about your own cultures? I have come to realize though that we don't have the best of other cultures moving here. We have the worst. As Ann Coulter repeats over and over, my and her ancestors were settlers. They came to build a country and to give - not take!

MM said (September 17, 2018):

Your article ‎["Racist" Smear Used to Displace Euro-Canadians] refers. I am an ardent reader of the articles you post in your website and I always agree with your views and opinions about historical as well as current world events. But I will disagree with you on the issue of "White Depopulation agenda" which I find to be a myth and really smells like the hoax known as the Holocaust.

Just like Chris G observes in his comment immediately after the article, Whites (so called) are not native to any part of the continent of America. Moreover, wherever the "white" man goes, he destroys indigenous traditional cultural systems and imposes instead his values that always lead to degeneracy and decay of social and moral values of the indigenous population, as has happened in India, Africa and the greatest of all, America (f*#k yeah!).

So if the "white" population in the American continent is reducing (which I really doubt) then maybe instead of complaining about it and blaming someone else (i.e. Avoiding responsibility, something you teach in your website), simply do the natural thing and reproduce like the rest of us Africans and Asians, like the way Jehovah commanded in the Bible.

CR said (September 17, 2018):

You said: "Third world immigrants to Canada tend not to assimilate and to promote their values over those of European-origin Canadians. "

However, those same European-origin Canadians are mostly unwilling (or incapable) to reproduce at a sufficient rate to maintain the population, and the majority seem to have bought into feminism, homosexuality, and whatever the latest form of gender-bending may be. Can you, in good conscience, recommend for immigrants to emulate the Canadian majority? I'm not a Muslim, but Sharia law sounds preferable to the direction in which this country is heading.

Peter said (October 30, 2017):

Great article.

This new immigration policy will be the end of democracy.

It the future people will vote according to their race.

Parties will represent race.

William said (October 29, 2017):

I see we have another apologist of the multicult here in the comments. Mohammed [below] repeats the oft-expressed lies of the left about how our forebears were nothing but murderers who slaughtered the idyllic Indians. He might want to look at other cultures throughout history that have conquered foreign lands and see what happened in those cases. That would require him to take off his anti-white colored lenses, however. He could start with Africa's wars of conquest among the various tribes there (and the slavery that existed long before the white man showed up). He could then look at how the ever-peaceful Indian here in North America engaged in bloody inter-tribe wars. Show me a case where the conquered get to lord themselves over the conquerors, like here in Canada.

Canada, as a nation, is settled and built (has been for a long time) and we don't need mass immigration. We have people here who are unemployed and need to work. The corporations all bleat that there's a labour shortage. Sorry for my language, but that's sheer and utter horseshit. What they really mean is that there's a shortage of people willing to work for poverty-level wages. That's the real reason they want Canada filled with immigrants from the third-world. These people will live ten people to an apartment and work for next to nothing while never standing up for themselves. This works to the corporation's advantage and to our society's detriment.

We're rapidly heading toward a balkanized Canada. We already see evidence of a dearth of social cohesion and a "Screw you, I have mine" mentality. Imagine how it will be when whites end up a minority in the land our fathers conquered. The guests who come to our country have their heads filled with how terrible the white man is. It won't be pretty when it all comes to a head. Maybe the white man will develop a backbone before that happens.

As you say, Henry, I don't mind minorities living among us, but it has to be a limited amount to preserve our culture and heritage so that the tail doesn't start wagging the dog (as is happening with the eager assistance of our traitor drama teacher "leader").

Lest anyone fall for the myth that mass immigration is a boon to our economy, I would recommend readers take a gander at this report:
Immigrants cost $23B a year: Fraser Institute report

http://nationalpost.com/news/canada/immigrants-cost-23b-a-year-fraser-institute-report

Wake up, Canada.

Mohammed (South Africa) said (October 28, 2017):

Henry, isn't it a bit rich for whites to talk of foreigners replacing Canadas "founding" people when these founders have so much of blood on their hands?
what they did to the native Indians & other peoples who lived all over the land cant be just ignored & we cant pin that completely on the Zionists(for a change).

at one point the so-called founders of Canada were the immigrants & now its the turn of a new wave of immigrants- they just happen to be mostly not whites.
so what?-as long as they become law abiding, productive members of society.
maybe if they are given time, they will prove to be great assets to Canada- surely we cant say that ONLY whites have the ability to be productive citizens.
i agree that the Zionists are trying to flood Canada with mostly non-whites but the way it's being presented as if these people are somehow inferior.
many whites wont like me saying this:

in the past 100 years, nobody has killed more innocent people than white nations & most of the people they killed were darker skinned people whose land or resources these whites wanted to steal.

maybe in Canada we could say that its only because these whites did all the dirty work(killing natives etc) & built Canada into what it is today, that these immigrants see it as an attractive destination but im sure that if these darker skinned immigrants were the pioneer immigrants, they would have been living in harmony with the local Indian tribes.
maybe canada would not be as developed as it is now but there would definitely not have been as much bloodshed as the whites were responsible for.

why cant we stop looking at race so much & educate the ppl about the architects behind all this social engineering? the normalising of gays & lesbians, pedos, abortions, porn, promiscuity & teen pregnancy etc.

most immigrants have strong moral & religious beliefs & are also deeply upset by these things-its just that most don't realize who is really behind it. they just believe its the "white man".

--

Give me a break Mohammed. It is the Masonic Jewish bankers not ordinary white people who are responsible for wars.

henry

Robert K said (October 28, 2017):

These immigration plans are developed by bureaucrats who have the benefit of anonymity, which is a clever arrangement designed to nullify the sentiments of the electorate. Cabinet Ministers are sometimes salesmen but most often mere fronts for policies handed to them; for the most part they, as novices in their areas of "responsibility" (actual parliamentary responsibility, once regarded as an indispensable element in our political system, is now a forgotten concept), are putty in the hands of their hidden advisers. When the media report that Trudeau did this or Trump did that, you should respond with a hearty laugh--as if being elected into office somehow instantly makes one an expert on all sciences, foreign affairs, the national economy, international trade, military capabilities, health matters, etc. Knowledge that others spend a lifetime acquiring is assumed to come to these political tyros, if they are even that, in a magical flash.

As for JG's proposition [below] that high levels of immigration are necessary because there are not enough native-born persons to fill the jobs needing to be done, apparently, he/she has missed the warnings of expert analysts that in the next ten to twenty years technological change will render about 50% of current employment positions redundant.

In the age of ramifying drones and industrial robots, the notion that providing for ourselves materially constitutes a big challenge is preposterous.

Marco A said (October 28, 2017):

Queue the Muslim apologist... Oh, there he is. I am sorry, but every time Islamists commit unthinkable crimes, there are always Muslim apologists who come out with the primary concern of making their religion seem less of a threat with their snake-like comments. They will seemingly condemn evil and then justify it at the same time claiming their religion is beyond reproach; 'a religion of peace'.

When there are no-go zones showing up all over Europe, Muslim minorities petitioning for Sharia courts and law, and a huge rape epidemic of white European women since this influx of invaders (with a large number of them always appearing Middle Eastern and by the name of Mohamed), we know there is a systemic problem with this Islamic religion.

Or should we place the problem on a racial issue instead?

Muslims are under complete mind control, they simply cannot condemn their own religion on any grounds. It is a warlike materialistic religion with a contempt of the rights of others who do not submit to their demon god Allah.

I am a Catholic, but when a doctrine of my faith says that all must submit to the 'Holy Pontiff' or face eternal damnation, I reject it as a monstrous lie and seriously question the Church. Can my 'brethren of the book' reciprocate on this sentiment.

"Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim3433)"

Anon said (July 12, 2015):

In relation to feminism channeling people to look at the world a certain way - psychotherapy/psychiatry does the same.

Both serve the state. As Hillman says, "Psychotherapy has become a servant of the state." Keeping people passive and feeling helpless. Paying another $300 to "look within" to solve issues better suited to putting better people in Congress or organising a meeting for better working conditions and pay. Or maybe organising a meeting to speak about banking enforcing slavery via a mortgage.

Hillman talks of a client he knew that spent 10 years in therapy with a low level depression. She had a high paying job. She decided to move away from LA to Colorado. Her therapist said she shouldn't as they were making progress with her "inner work". She went anyway and immediately her depression lifted. Hillman call's it "moving van therapy".

The internet is the same - people staring blankly at their screens terrifying themselves with Alex Jones screaming the government is coming to take their guns and their kids to forcibly vaccinate them. I'd say the internet has become a "servant of the state" letting people think they are changing the world via a Facebook "like".

I hope the context is more clear.

Kure said (July 9, 2015):

Thank you for your efforts to bring valuable articles to your readers' attention. This write-up is strikingly awakening about the level of destruction meted on normal lives; the responses that follow are equally revealing.

I have decided to store it in my mails because I want to revisit it. Then I can reach you again for proactive initiatives. For it is easier to destroy than to build. If the cynics about Family and Marriage are working tirelessly to achieve their aims, the builders should be ready to sacrifice double to counter them.

Duane said (July 9, 2015):

Betty's and Gloria's work were very effective (if only indirectly...)....

Have you notice what is becoming more and more prevalent among each succeeding generation of amerikan "women"?

1) No Husband
2) No Children (always dogs or cats, sometimes 15 animals...)....
3) a new "boyfriend every 6-18 months until they become menopausal, looks crash and men don't want to go near them anymore....
Quite honestly...by the time they've been out whoring around for as little a 2 years could they EVER properly bond with ANY man?
What normal man would want this type of whore to bear their children? I DON'T.....
My mother was a crazed vicious whore who had children from three different men and mostly followed the pattern I aforementioned
except she didn't work, mostly collected welfare.... I didn't ever psychologically start to recover from that mess until I was in my late 30's.
I'm still thankful everyday for the loving maternal Grandparents I had who saved me.....

I have several pathetic females in my family currently in various stages of this mess......Not looking good for them....

Ann Diamond said (July 9, 2015):

Steinem was never one of my heroines, although I joined "the women's movement' in 1970 at age 19 -- it was part of my transition out of my parents' world and into the exciting world of my peers. We believed we were changing the world. Most feminist leaders at the time were disappointing up close -- I met Marlene Dixon, Germaine Greer, Phyllis Chesler between 1970 and 1974 when I abandoned women's groups. In person, Chesler seemed like any self-centered New York Jewish Princess, like Ms. editor Robin Morgan who I saw in a video, browbeating her pathetic mouse of a husband. Anyone with a sense of smell could sense the heavy aura of cynicism and arrogance surrounding these supposed leaders.What's interesting in retrospect is their stellar rise to fame and fortune, which only happens when you have CIA-Rockefeller backing.

Sixties culture saturated with 'stars' from intelligence backgrounds.Columbia's psychiatry institute locked up people like Allen Ginsberg, training them via mind control imported from Nazi German to unleash them later as leaders of a generation. J.D. Salinger appeared on the cover of LIFE and TIME on the basis of a first novel. Naturally young writers dreamed of repeating his formula. Sylvia Plath wanted to write a feminist Catcher in the Rye featuring a female Holden Caulfield -- if you read her novel The Bell Jar, set in 1953, it's full of Cold War mind control references. By 1963, she'd committed suicide -- I think she actually had a soul that could not survive in a world of lies. Her ex-husband, Ted Hughes, was a renowned Mason and became Poet Laureate composing verses on the Queen Mother's birthday.

It's much clearer sorting all this out in retrospect, rather than living through it as a confused young person. But who did these puppets really influence -- other than the other up-and-coming phonies who struggle to climb the ladder of fakery? Seen from any angle, it's all just Voodoo --

Mary said (July 8, 2015):

Gloria Steinem article is amazing Henry! My exact thoughts...she "Eve" has ruined the world! How she pulled it off is even more amazing.....people need to listen to God and not female who think they are a god!

Al Thompson said (July 8, 2015):

If there is anything rotten or evil in society, most of the problems come from government. Feminism is just like the homosexual movement. Both are anti-social and they do great harm to the bulwark of society which is the family. No one can overstate the damage these ideas do to society. And religions are of no help as they stand by and watch the carnage without lifting a finger to help. They don't want to lose their tax privileges that they get from the government.

I suggest that people look more at the results of the last few decades as that will tell us everything we need to know. Society has been stressed to the limit with feminism. I had to deal with that nonsense in my early twenties. Women then were a real problem for a man like me who just wanted to have a nice family and a good career to support that family. And there's no point in looking to the same people to fix the problem because they are the ones who created these problems: government and religion. In my opinion, women are not attractive if they are feminists. Today, many are nasty wenches who want to feed their own selfishness.

Steinem is supposed to be a Jew yet she supports the same exact system of communism-socialism that got millions of Jews killed. In fact, millions of non-Jews have lost their lives too, more so than the Jews. I ask the question: How can Jew libtards support such an evil system that breaks down the family?

To support the evil of destroying the proper relationship between men and women, people like Steinem are just rotten to the core. Given the satanic symbol she uses we can see that she knows exactly who she works for; the Devil. Notice that the closer she gets to the end of her life, her appearance is old. She has flabby arms and a wrinkled face. This happens to all of us, but you would think she'd be more aware of her mortality. She knows she has done wrong but continues to do it out of an evil pride. It is best to separate from people like this.
http://verydumbgovernment.blogspot.com/2014/09/government-and-religion-are-obsolute.html