Howard said (February 26, 2009):

Great article Henry; few are honest enough to tell it like it is. 2 obvious points. If homosexuality is a trait born in DNA, by definition the trait exterminates itself with that generation. One of your detractors pointed out he was a gay Christian. I mean no offence here, but that's as impossible as a person being a Christian murderer, liar, pedophile, astrologer, or witch. I used to think the ultimate oxy-moron was Military Intelligence, now I think it may be Military Chaplains. Christianity like the bible is not negotiable; we can take it or we can leave it. Just don't complain to Jesus is He decides to do the same. Theresnothingnew.org/

Don said (February 26, 2009):

Good article about all porn being gay. I have one question that I think readers should ponder. Why should anyone pay for this stuff when it is given away for nothing?

Anyone who surfs the net will sooner or later be re-directed to a porn site. There must be thousands of sites. If one chooses, they could look at these sites for days on end without paying a penny. So why would anyone pay for this stuff? In a way it is like a restaurant that serves happy hour hors d'oeuvres without limit in order to entice patrons to stay for dinner. I have witnessed that scenario firsthand and almost always the people eat and drink their fill and leave without buying dinner. Internet porn is similar in this respect.

Looking at it strictly as a business, I have serious doubts as to whether it could survive giving away free samples of everything virtually without limit. I would bet that the sites are supported by funding other than the viewers or that there is a mixture of “sponsored” porn and viewer supported porn. The banksters promoting this filth have no qualms about collecting money for something they are giving away for free anyway, so the fools that pay are an added bonus to them.

I don’t buy nor do I know anyone who buys – porn or magazines such as Playboy, and I’m not writing about 700 Club members etc. In addition, I’ve never seen anyone purchase such a magazine when I’ve been at a store. Maybe someone buys this stuff at 3 AM, but with the economy being what it is, there must be some cutbacks and we should expect to see some of these businesses fail. That is - unless people are so addicted to it they buy it instead of food, or it is financed by other means this industry will collapse. I believe that the porn industry is financed by other means and will always be available for viewing regardless of the economy.

--

Dear Don,

I suspect it is being subsidized to corrupt young women (the models) and all men. -h

BM said (February 26, 2009):

Your article "Why All Porn Is Gay" is certainly provocative. I think that "Why All Porn Is Male" would be a more accurate title, though: it involves the "male gaze" and biology. Of course, male-on-male sexuality would only compound this basically male phenomenon of... voyeurism? objectification? promiscuity? (This promiscuity is nothing new: look how much appears in the Bible for example, among various religious patriarchs. For one thing, look how many wives they had!)

The Illuminati religion is a SOLAR PHALLIC CULT. This idolatry is at the core of modern Freemasonry. I'd recommend looking into the relevant presentations by Bill Schnoebelen, and William Cooper's "Mystery Babylon" series (on YouTube), for ample documentation.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2748614967389038944

The Cabalistic/Talmudic traditions you rightly decry represent PATRIARCHAL traditions (the "Traditions of the Fathers", which Jesus condemned). They embody male supremacism - not only Jewish supremacism. When male supremacism revs up, you're likely to see a lot of porn and promiscuity (or, alternately, a lot of hypocrisy, repression, and sexual abuse/pedophilia).

Lesbians and straight women, in my experience, do not tend to be nearly the porn aficionados that many gay men and straight men are. It's primarily a MALE phenomenon - not a "homosexual" phenomenon. (If you notice a lot of porn within the gay male community, that's essentially because it's male-on-male, i.e. male squared!)

I would agree with you that the sex act has primarily a reproductive function (as many traditions affirm). From that base, we can perceive a continuum of sexual activity that spreads further and further from this center. You seem hung up on the "homosexual identity" issue, implying that there is such a fixed state as a "heterosexual identity": in fact, any such rigid division is arbitrary, manmade, and not found in nature. Nor do you address bisexuality adequately. (I certainly don't find that self-identified homosexuals and bisexuals are any better served by the Illuminati than are self-identified heterosexuals! We're all in a similar cultural mess: and ought to show more compassion to one another. This will help thwart the Illuminati's divide-and-conquer strategy.)

Animals, like humans, are sexual: period. Gender attraction is a complex continuum. It's perhaps unfortunate for sexual theorists that the messy reality doesn't fit into neat conceptual boxes... but there you have it. Reality is not binary - contrary to what the machine-mind would have us believe!

Sexual intercourse can be a lot of fun: but eventually it's probably time to "put away childish things" and aim one's sights higher, rather than prolonging Peter Pan priapism! Beyond physical beings and sexual beings, we are spiritual beings. Yet many monastic traditions have sought to repress natural human sexuality - with disastrous results! Perhaps there is a time to explore one's sexuality and go a bit wild (youth), and a time to become more disciplined (maturity).

Randy Rimmer said (February 26, 2009):

I have just read your article and could not keep from laughing. The internet is a wonderful illuminator for showing just how utterly
stupid some people allow themselves to become when their critical thinking and logical functions are overwhelmed by prejudices, bias
and/or underlying mental deficiency.

Unfortunately there is no cure for foolishness so you will just have to suffer as you do from craziness. You poor creature.

--

Rimmer,

I love your name. Fitting.

h

Bill said (February 26, 2009):

nteresting coincidence that this was rerun on rense today. i visited newsfilter.org today.

it features lesbian vids, hetero vids (but mostly anal or oral), strange fetish vids like vomiting and an occassional shockingly violent vid (real, not staged). its totally free. the combination seems to be a witches brew of some sort.

not sure how to trace a websites origin but i have a feeling it is a psyop.

Jubin said (February 26, 2009):

At first, I did not understand where you were coming from on any issue. Slowly, I started to come around, when I would read from other sources, lines of thought or events that you clearly and cogently had already confirmed. I fought you all the way though, always looking for holes here and there, mostly finding none, actually at this moment I cannot think of one. I am good at looking for and finding holes, inconsistencies, but reading your work, and looking up your background, I found none really, and like I mentioned I was looking all the way, every time, but came up against a logic that pointed to my own holes. ha! kind of the ultimate switcheroo. proof of something. anyway, for some reason at first i was put off probably because i was equating some of your work vis-a-vis men with robert bly (cooky). But as I mentioned the logic and the argument is so very tight and revealing at the same time that all you can do is say yes. so thanks. very valuable. For example, regarding ' why all porn is gay [encore]' , you put into place and words ideas that i have been aware of but could not quite make sense of, until reading some of your work. and then having it confirmed by outside independent events or persons. so thats good. take care.

Ben said (February 19, 2006):

You have articulated many of my own ideas regarding the role of pornography, etc, and its primacy in our changing culture. (I am referring to your recent article 'Why All Porn Is Gay.') I feel you are really on to something here. I think it can be stated that pornography has become the dominant cultural medium of the twenty first century. The speed with which it has surfaced from the gutter and into the very heart of the mainstream, has been breathtaking. As you rightly say, we were not at all prepared.

Its impact- particularly via the internet- with its indiscriminate range, combined with ever-improving developments in mobile technology, have yet to be fully understood; though its effects are being felt. We live in a confused, shadowy realm where technology is sexualising our infants (whose precocious development appears to be mirroring this, as if there were a causal, or material relationship between the factors) yet we succumb daily to ever more sentimentalised, even paranoid ideas about 'child protection'.

You may also have considered the distinctly homosexual- or, at least, the not-exactly heterosexual- qualities of many female 'porn stars.' This is another example of technology (in this case, cosmetic modification) contributing to the creation of a New Master Race. The idealized woman- so far as she exists in the imagination of the American smut industry- possesses none of the spiritual attributes so long associated with feminity. This is increasingly true of her physical aspect also. I have long believed that there is something non-female, even non-human, about the silicone-enhanced, inflated grotesques of popular smut. I fear it is most definitely the shape of things to come.

Consider also the industry's obsession with anal sex, and what we see revealed is the incursion of the worst aspects of gay culture foisted upon the mainstream.

[email protected]

Keith said (February 17, 2006):

Dear Henry
I agree with your thesis that all Porn is Gay and the general thrust of your argument, but I disagree on some technical points. I think it is a mistake to refer to them as The Illuminate. This will cause many people to dismiss you as a crank.
I prefer the term "The Brotherhood of Unnatural
Love", the BUL. This is what their chapter calls
itself in Australia where I live. I know a great deal about them from personal experience and from research.
Of course world wide they trade under a
proliferation of names, "The Uranians", etc, but BUL conveys what they are and encompassed all of history, while Illuminate implies they are something relatively modern. They are very ancient, but have never been all powerful and they are more vulnerable today than in
all history since we now know what causes their trait and how to wipe it out so they are frantic to stop the public learning the truth - which would finish them off.
And I think it mistaken to suggest that the belief of the Media and The Left that humans are infinitely malleable is true. If they were then they would have total control of us and there would be no hope for us at all.
Such defeatism causes people to give up in despair
which is the most wrong thing to do since we are on
the brink of victory over this ancient menace.
What they all fear and have always feared is the
light. Indeed folklore and popular TV thrillers
symbolism then as vampires and they are spot on!
But it is not a stake through the heart that is
fatal to them, but the simple truth.

LH said (April 22, 2018):

The image you used for this article is grossly misleading......
For one that person can never be cured of feminism.
You selected a tranny.
It has an Adam's apple easily discernible once our mass programming has been broken
Second, it has a longer left-hand ring finger than the index finger. This is 95% male indicator along with brow ridge, sunken inset eyes within the socket which a woman does not have the deep sunken eyes.
Strong angular jawline male traits.

I had to look for these details to share with you. I did not need to look closely for myself. It shouted I'm a man in women's get up.
It has taken me over six months of studying the transgender / Baphomet worship cult of Hollywood and all entertainment media.Now the hypnotic spell is broken and spotting trannies is getting easier for me. It takes time but more people need to be made aware of this huge deception.

This is a topic I do not think you have covered in detail. There is a whole medical industry that supports the transition, rib removal nose jobs boob jobs hormone therapy etc. . There is also a clothing industry that supports the baby bump, hips.
It is difficult to find a real woman. Most ALL A-lister actresses are trannies.
Most all Country singers especially grand ol opry, rock stars, etc.

AS said (April 22, 2018):

All these female contradictions create an emotional charge that pushes you down the emotional scale and communism is low on that scale, very low.

In fact, you can cure communism just to raise a person on that scale. Communism is a low emotional charge on the level of hostile in a veil.

EFT is fast, free of charge and easy to do on yourself. Open source and free of charge.
Investment: some hours of first reading then doing.
Extra bonus is body problems vanish in seconds.

https://eft.mercola.com/

Dawn said (April 22, 2018):

Henry this article is absolutely fascinating.

I think there are a lot of things that gave rise to feminism and that it initially had good reason for existing. Women working in WWII, women being isolated and bored at home in the 50s and not realizing that connection rather than work was the answer, and the hyperfocus on babying children instead of loving them but not coddling them.

But this is one thing that I have never ever thought of, and it makes perfect sense. "Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned". I've been lucky to find gentlemen in my life but I've also known players. The way you describe how your sweet relationship changed... and then she became a rabid feminist! Of course, you know now how wonderful and transcendent actual making love is, and that causal relations don't hold a candle to this.

It makes sense to think that this sexual freedom everyone partook in, and the subsequent loss of the experience of true love and intimacy could cause chaos. People don't always make conscious choices, they just follow the easiest path. A woman's behavior and attitude completely changes around a strong man who loves her and is devoted to her. If that doesn't present itself, or if those men start leaving her or mistreating her bc of porn and easy sex, how does she know? I dated someone from the eastern block so I was luckier than most and got to experience this right off the bat.

Anyway, no man is perfect that's for sure but the culture of respect for women is lost. Even though they think they've gained everything :(

Jason said (April 22, 2018):

I really enjoy your work Henry. I have a couple of brief comments to add.

1) feminists are not independent at all since they rely on the government to fight all their battles so all feminists are married to government.

2) if women were to be truly cured of feminism they have to give up their government protector/aggressor in favor of a man.

Since women are generally far more practical and cunning than men I do believe that neither of my conditions above can ever be admitted to, much less given up, and thus there can be no cure.

Skip said (April 22, 2018):

Wow Henry, seems this writing brought in several negative comments , which I see as progress, as it means that they have not only come to your site, but are reading the articles and voicing an opinion.

Now this will lead to communication, which can lead to change. I enjoy your site and articles though agreeing with all of them of course is foolish at best, I tip my hat to you sir for proving nothing is
completely lost, until the fat lady sings. Although Emily appears to be screaming for the Fat Lady to come on stage.

CJ said (April 22, 2018):

Jennifer and I both want to tweak paragraph 4.
4. Stop being "smarter, better, faster" than the men you meet. (Just because you can run circles around a man doesn't mean you should.) To create a successful family, a woman self-effaces and lives through her husband and children.

(This is feminine power, and not a weakness. To think otherwise means you are deceived.)

Tony B said (December 30, 2015):

Always an early complaint of the feminists is that the men they meet only want sex. But none of them seem able to understand that the very reason for that is that feminists offer men NOTHING ELSE. After all, the only surface difference between the feminist and men is her vagina and boobs. What else is there for a man to like?

Nature has created men more apt to try for sex and women to be the ones with the words "yes" or "no." True the pill and other anti life means have put a large crimp in nature and it is now easier for women to say "yes" and not "pay for it" with pregnancy, an action long known as one of the very worst sins for both partners, married or not.

The fact that life worked much better all around before planned nonparenthood shows immediately in all the hell between the sexes today as compared to the past. What is consequently almost completely lost by both sexes today - at least among the young - is the concept of family, and without that concept civilization is doomed. Can anyone deny that the present in-your-face faggots and dykes, a direct result of sex without responsibility, are not a sign of the death of civilization?

Sex selfishness at the expense of real responsible love is not just self-destructive, it is civilization destructive. Feminism preaches the opposite.

Faye (from Ohio) said (November 25, 2006):

You are so right. Men confronted with a question, or making a decision, think it through before answering.. They tend to see all sides.

Women, see through their emotions, and sometimes want quick answers. THats where patience comes in for a man. He needs to show her why. and stand fast when he knows the outcome.

A real man has control of himself and knows his role. He is the provider and protector. He avoids temptations which divert him from his goal, married or not.

Power does not fulfill a women in her deepest needs. They do everything to attract a man, then are at a loss when they get one.

Everything we see is sex, sex, sex..No wonder things are so out of control

Pedro said (April 22, 2018):

They would on average fail abysmally on an emotional intelligence test which beyond a certain level of IQ is more germane to the survival of the planet. (the Blade Runner test).

If we had another major ice age, which Western man survived by huddling together and being conservative and forward-looking (to the short warm season) then I wonder how these middle east types (oriental they used to call them) would fare.

Gilad Atzmon reckons they got some smarts (and some dumbs) by marrying the smart rabbis son to the merchants daughter.

It's a welfare system they have benefited from amongst themselves (as have freemasons) long before this modern welfare state. (and it's nemesis , cruel exploitation of their lesser brethren).

The greatest Jewish genius ever? Try reading this one to deflate that myth.

https://archive.org/details/ChristopherJonBjerknesTheManufactureAndSaleOfSaintEinstein

Tony E said (April 21, 2018):

know one Authentic Jewish genius who will not be included in this upcoming documentary, The great and courageous Bobby Fischer.

Jude Duffy said (April 21, 2018):

Israelis as a whole have a pretty ordinary official IQ, but as far as I'm concerned that's neither here nor there, since I treat collective racial IQ scores with the same level of trust I I give to msm accounts of "chemical attacks".

It beats me how folk (e.g. white nationalists) who exhibit extreme scepticism about other establishment narratives treat collective IQ ratings as the equivalent of holy writ. Such stats often make zero sense when analyzed. For example, European Mediterranean countries like Spain and Italy have significantly higher official IQs than Arab and north African countries; yet the Latin countries also beat European countries such as Serbia and Croatia - nations which share much less genetic heritage with Arabs and North Africans than Spaniards and Italians do.

There are only a few real explanations for these anomalies: (1) the tests themselves are intrinsically flawed (2) the tests are often improperly conducted or the collective results are fraudulently compiled and collated - e.g. for reasons of national or ethnic prestige, etc. (3) race is not the real determining factor in IQ at all.

WA said (April 21, 2018):

After reading this latest article that you sent, these two articles came to mind. They represent what many Bible believing Christians believe about Israel and the Jews.

Wolf-Andre

The True Israel Of God - L.R. Shelton
http://www.mountainretreatorg.net/bible/israel2.html

Amillennialism 101 - Jesus Christ: The True Israel - Dr. Kim Riddlebarger
http://kimriddlebarger.squarespace.com/the-latest-post/2008/4/1/amillennialism-101-jesus-christ-the-true-israel.html

Duane said (April 21, 2018):

If the Jews want to make a Jewish supremacy video FINE....

But when a group of Germans did the same type of thing (a group that 100 years ago had the most bragging rights on the planet) you get this: "Judea declares war on Germany" (Daily Express 1933), and they then manipulated their stupid shabbos goy into murdering 10 million Germans....(it's continuing today...Germany is now a vassal state of israel)...

The reason why jews have high admissions to Ivy League schools is because these once "goyim" institutions have been
completely taken over by Jews and obviously favor their own and discriminate against Whites and Asians in admissions....

Chess? Yes, it's possible that 40 percent of the best chess players are Jewish...But why? Most young Jews do not gravitate towards athletics so they instead pursue another extracurricular activity that doesn't take a lot of physical effort.

(many young Jews also pursue other non athletic activities like professional poker playing, magic and race horse handicapping...)....

G said (April 21, 2018):

Jeez, Henry, you really leveled the playing field on that one. Kind of called them out. Hard for others to rise if they keep getting shoved out of the way.

Annette said (April 21, 2018):

Read your article on “what’s with the Jews. Aside from the things you pointed out, one of the things that struck me as I scanned through the movie was the number of Jews who have been lauded as Genius’s or great contributors that were in fact charlatans, cheats, or just plain overrated.

I’m sure you are quite aware of this yourself. There is no question that as a group Jews are intelligent, but I question how much of this genius is real or just a con job and PR, and just how much more superlative Jews are when compared with Asians or Caucasians. You have exposed Freud. Christopher Byerknes has exposed Einstein’s plagiarism, and there is plenty out there now about what a monster Jonas Salk was and the true failure and hype of the polio vaccine. https://www.naturalnews.com/031564_Jonas_Salk_medical_experiments.html

How many of these other prominent Jews got where they were on genuine merit as opposed to tribal loyalties or fraud? I don’t’ have the answer to that, but I suspect it is a contributor to this story of supposed prominence because of brilliance.